We have a situation where there is a changing of the guard, but the old guard isn’t letting go of its post too easily. What I am referring to is the philosophy of distance running for exercises, improved conditioning and endurance, and setting a base for non-dominant aerobic sports. The other part to the story is should we have young kids involved in distance running programs. I have two thoughts on this ….

First off, I believe distance running for kids is very individualized with respect to success and enjoyment. Basically, just like it is for adults. I can remember when I use to team teach P.E. with a good friend of mine. Many times we would blast some fun energetic Golden Oldies music and have the kids run around the gymnasium for several minutes. The kids could run with their best friends, talk if they wanted, and even walk when they needed a break. It that particular setting, I believe we made it enough of an event where the kids enjoyed it, at least to some extent. As I look at it and realize how many kids (I would be willing to say 80%) were not physically designed to run long distances. They were not built to take the consistent step by step pounding. Many of these kids were rounded at the shoulders, big tummies, poorly aligned knees and overly pronated feet. I look back now and say, “wow, did we miss the boat by having these kids run”? Did we potentially create an unsafe atmosphere where kids could have developed even poorer physical alignments? The answer is, “I really don’t know”. But, if I had to do it over again I would have the kids perform long slow constant running. The positive to it was we made it fun by giving them a time frame and blasting upbeat music.

I believe if the kids are biomechanically designed with lighter bodies and good upright posture that the running exercises we did probably wasn’t so bad. These kids are economically efficient and have less stress on the joints than the not so biomechanically aligned kids.

The second part of my thinking is this…what benefits do we really gain by having young kids run distance? If a child likes to do it and they get a lot of personal satisfaction, then go for it. They might have to deal with the consequences, but if they are physically designed to handle the running they might be fine. As I look at all the potential gains a young person can achieve from performing more explosive anaerobic activities compared to the gains they get with simply running, I am not so sure there is even an argument.

Distance running develops a neurological pattern that is less powerful in the athletes gait and overall movement. They don’t ever explode as they would need to in most court and field sports or recess activities. The aerobic base they develop has little if any transfer over to the type of base they need for court and field sports. The important factors of gaining agility, coordination, deceleration and acceleration are not focused on so they are not developed when the primary source of conditioning is long slow distance running.

I believe we use running, like most other things we do in life, because we never challenged what we were taught over generations. I have talked numerous times regarding the old attitude that athletes shouldn’t use a “false step”. We now know it isn’t a false step, rather it is a forceful re-positioning of the feet to accelerate quicker. We have used running as a form of warm-up, pre-season conditioning and training for years because it was never challenged. It is time to challenge it with the youth population and look for better ways to accomplish the goals we originally thought distance running would.

I am not going to sit here and tell adults that love to run or kids that love to run to stop and never do it again. I will ask what their goal is? If there goal is too lose weight, I have a better way. If there goal is to get in better shape, I have a better way. If there goal is to get a “base” before the season, I have a much better way. If they want to just enjoy fitness and exercise, I have many other ways that are safer, more physically productive and useful.

Like anything else in life, you have to decide for yourself. Research will give you what you want it to give you. I can find research that says it is great for you and I can find research that says it is bad for you. The bottom line is I want kids that are athletic, explosive, mobile, stable, quick, and able to change directions so they can enjoy many sports and activities. I know long distance running doesn’t give young kids these things.

Have fun with this and see if it makes sense.

P.S. – Quick story… When Jenn and I first met in Lexington, KY she was a runner. I didn’t run. Because I was smitten, I decided I would become a runner so I could share more time with her. Keep in mind; I was a very good athlete at the time. I was only 26 years old, still able to dunk a basketball and run and cut really well. I never had any major injuries or pains to my joints. After roughly two weeks of running I developed severe IT Band tendinitis. I also developed angle pain. I tried to mask it but couldn’t anymore. Luckily, Jenn was an athletic trainer (ATC) and was able to work on my leg. So I look at running two ways. It broke down my body when all the basketball, tennis, racquetball, and football wasn’t able to and secondly it did get my future wife to put her hands on me sooner!